Ohio HB 183 aka The Bathroom Bill

HB183, Ohio’s House Bill which is titled “Regards single-sex bathroom access in schools, universities”


This bill can be found here, https://ohiohouse.gov/legislation/135/hb183


I had hoped to give my testimony in person at this committee meeting today, but I had a late night service ticket and didn’t make it home until the early morning. On top of that, today is also my 15 year anniversary with my Babette Erin Stewart-Arness (HI BABE!) and then I have an early job tomorrow. So sleep won out.


I don’t support, and mostly oppose this bill, why? For one, I can understand why people think this bill needs to exist. On the other hand, this bill, and other such bills, without intention I believe, are slowly whittling away men’s (boy’s) freedoms.

Below is my written testimony on this bill, and below that is my in-person testimony I was going to give.
H.B. 183 Ohio House Higher Education Committee 10-11-2023 submitted testimony drafted 10-10-2023

Steven Arness AKA Steven Arness

While it may not look like it, I stand before you as the epitome of microaggressions, bigotry, and discrimination, of which I will give you some of my personal experiences.


So lets ask the question, and while it may not sound serious to you, it is for me, as a heterosexual male, which restroom do I use?


Yes, I know, it is a rather silly question now isn’t it as looking at me right now you assuredly would say for me to use the men‘s restroom.


I ask because if me and my wife were to visit a place of public accommodations dressed in the same attire, I could be told to change clothes or leave.


In fact I was told to leave a place of public accommodations for dressing the same way as other females had the freedom to do. When I asked the Ohio Civil Rights Commission to look into this. The defendant blatantly admitted that I would not have been kicked out if I was a women. And while the commission did agree that I was discriminated against based on sex, they denied me conciliation and closed the case.


You see, sometimes I wear a skirt, yes, a heterosexual male wearing a skirt that a typical female might wear. I am not transgender, transvestite, gay, cross-dresser, child molester, pedophile, or mentally ill.


Civil rights organizations all speak of equality, but being a white heterosexual male has none of them standing behind or next to me. Those that you think would, like the ACLU, drop my concerns as some man wearing a skirt needs psychiatric help, not civil right help. Instead I have organizations and individuals that stand in front of me and block my path saying I do not have the same rights as women and they suffer no reproductions for doing so.


So which restroom do I use? The one with the skirted picture? Or the one that says men’s? Or as most people have been made to believe, should I say I’m transgender when I wear a skirt? If I use the men’s room while wearing a skirt, what kind of issues will that cause? The women’s? When my wife wears pants, should she be using he restroom depicting pants? What about women that use the men’s room at events due to the long lines for the women’s?


In my over 20 years of operating an amusement park, I interacted with thousands of kids and adults every year. And while I tried to stay gender neutral when I came across someone who was androgynes, sometimes I slipped, some where okay, others upset, but I never treated any of them with disrespect. Why don’t we have different restrooms for democrats and republicans? From the outside I think we can agree that they look the same.


What about a Tomboy, or a Janegirl? Is someone in authority going to put a label on their forehead and hand so that they/we can verify which restroom they are to use? It’s ludicrous to claim that transgender males are going into female restrooms and transgender females are going into male restrooms for nefarious purposes. They don’t want that kind of attention and they typically don’t want to be in there any longer then necessary.


I went to watch an ice skating competition, a little girl and I presume her dad entered and I watched as it took him two tries before he found a women to take his daughter into the girls locker room to get changed. A little while later I saw a mom show up with her son and they both walked straight into the men’s bathroom/boys changing room.


One day at learn to skate a little girl asked me to tie her skates, I told her no, she asked why, I said I couldn’t, she asked why not? After a few more back and forth’s, she finally left and sought help elsewhere, now I certainly could tie her skates. But I face enough repercussions for just wearing a skirt to not give ignorant people more ammunition. In hindsight It was wrong of those people to make me feel the way I did and I hope one day that little girl understood why I said no.


My wife certainly doesn’t claim to be transgender when wearing pants, and nobody cares when she does. Yet when I wear an unbifurcated garment, I’m escorted out of the building. Do you know what my wife’s solution is to my skirt wearing? To move outside the United States, can you believe that? In the land of the free she suggested that we move out of the country.
It doesn’t matter if this bill passes or not as it does not address the root of the problem. And the problem is not a girl that wants to be a boy that would need to use the boys restroom, or a boy that wants be a girl that would need to use the girls restroom.


The problem is that we are scared of men, and more so that we are ashamed of our own bodies. Nobody believes me when I tell them about the discrimination I have experienced, and when I elaborate, they tell me to just wear pants. Why? Do they tell people of color to change their skin tone to white? Do they tell females to change their sex?


And that’s what this bill, and some of the other bills are really about are they not? To suppress males from experiencing gender freedom as its all fine when we uplift women, yet turn around and squash males when they attempt the same. There is a saying that says, “Anyone can be anything they want to be” well, unless your male that is. We made all kinds of laws to bring females level with males, while being blind to the societal restrictions that we placed on them.


In 2003 US Figure Skating changed the singles rules on women’s attire in allowing them to wear trousers in competition. And then in 2021 they removed all attire based restrictions across all disciplines, males however are still required to wear full length trousers. Look at congress, even they can’t make unbiased clothing rules.


Why is it so hard to treat everyone equally as individuals instead of segregating them into pre-made biased boxes and restricting them from doing something that harms no-one?


I’m getting old, all I want to do is skate, and perhaps inspire others to express their own freedom. I shouldn’t have to choose which restroom to use based on what I’m wearing or how I feel. All I want to be is me, and I just need to tinkle.



H.B. 183 Ohio House Higher Education Committee 10-11-2023 proposed in-person testimony

Steven Arness AKA Steven Arness

(Revised 3:31pm October 10th 2023)

(Direct all talking to Chairman, refer to others if needed through Chairman.)

Chairman Mr. Merrin, Ranking Member Mr. Boyd and members of the Higher Education Committee, thank you for the opportunity to testify today on House Bill 183. My name is Steven Arness and I am here today to share with you my personal experiences and thoughts about this legislation.


While it may not look like it, I stand before you as the epitome of microaggressions, bigotry, and discrimination.
So lets ask the question, and while it may not sound serious to you, it is for me, as a heterosexual male, which restroom do I use?


Yes, I know, it is a rather silly question now isn’t it as looking at me right now you assuredly would say for me to use the men‘s restroom.


I ask because if me and my wife were to visit a place of public accommodations dressed in the same attire, I could be told to change clothes or leave.


In fact I was told to leave a place of public accommodations for dressing the same way as other females had the freedom to do. When I asked the Ohio Civil Rights Commission to look into this. The defendant blatantly admitted that I would not have been kicked out if I was a women. And while the commission did agree that I was discriminated against based on sex, they denied me conciliation and closed the case.


You see, sometimes I wear a skirt, yes, a heterosexual male wearing a skirt that a typical female might wear. (I didn’t wear a skirt today as I wasn’t sure if I would be turned away at the door.) I assure you that I am not transgender, transvestite, gay, cross-dresser, child molester, pedophile, or mentally ill.


Civil rights organizations all speak of equality, but being a white heterosexual male has none of them standing behind or next to me. Those that you think would, drop my case as they think some man wearing a skirt needs psychiatric help, not civil rights help. Instead I have organizations and individuals that stand in front of me and block my path saying I do not have the same rights as women and they suffer no repercussions for doing so.


Omit for time (So which restroom do I use? The one with the skirted picture? Or the one that says men’s? Or as most people have been made to believe, should I say I’m transgender when I wear a skirt? If I use the men’s room while wearing a skirt, what kind of issues will that cause? The women’s? When my wife wears pants, should she be using he restroom depicting pants? What about women that use the men’s room at events due to the long lines for the women’s?)


Omit for time (In my over 20 years of operating an amusement park, I interacted with thousands of kids and adults every year. And while I tried to stay gender neutral when I came across someone who was androgynes, sometimes I slipped, some where okay, others upset, but I never treated any of them with disrespect. Why don’t we have different restrooms for democrats and republicans? From the outside I think we can agree that they look the same.)


What about a Tomboy, or a Janegirl? Or someone who is androgynous? Is someone in authority going to put a label on their forehead and hand so that they/we can verify which restroom they are to use? It’s ludicrous to claim that transgender males are going into female restrooms and transgender females are going into male restrooms for nefarious purposes. They don’t want that kind of attention and they typically don’t want to be in there any longer then necessary.


I went to watch an ice skating competition, a little girl and I presume her dad entered and I watched as it took him two tries before he found a women to take his daughter into the girls locker room to get changed. A little while later I saw a mom show up with her son and they both walked straight into the men’s bathroom/boys changing room.


One day at learn to skate a little girl asked me to tie her skates, I told her no, she asked why, I said I couldn’t, she asked why not? After a few more back and forth’s, she finally left and sought help elsewhere, now I certainly could tie her skates. But I face enough repercussions for just wearing a skirt to not give ignorant people more ammunition. In hindsight It was wrong of those people to make me feel the way I did and I hope one day that little girl understands (understood) why I said no.
(Others have told me that organizations such as Shaker Heights figure skating club enacted sexist dress codes to keep me from participating.)


My wife certainly doesn’t claim to be transgender when wearing pants, and nobody cares when she does. Yet when I wear an unbifurcated garment, I’m escorted out of the building. Do you know what my wife’s solution is to my skirt wearing? To move outside the United States, can you believe that? In the land of the free she suggested that we move out of the country. (Look around you, how many men are dressed the same compared to women.)


It doesn’t matter if this bill passes or not as it does not address the root of the problem. And the problem is not a girl that wants to be a boy that would need to use the boys restroom, or a boy that wants be a girl that would need to use the girls restroom.


The problem is that we are scared of men, and more so that we are ashamed of our own bodies.


Omit for time (Nobody believes me when I tell them about the discrimination I have experienced, and when I elaborate, they tell me to just wear pants. Why? Do they tell people of color to change their skin tone to white? Do they tell females to change their sex?)


And that’s what this bill, and some of the other bills are really about are they not? To suppress males from experiencing gender freedom as its all fine when we uplift women, yet turn around and squash males when they attempt the same. There is a saying that says, “Anyone can be anything they want to be” well, unless your male that is. We made all kinds of laws to bring females level with males, while being blind to the societal restrictions that we placed on them (men.)


In 2003 US Figure Skating changed the singles rules on women’s attire in allowing them to wear trousers in competition. And then in 2021 they removed all attire based restrictions across all disciplines, males however are still required to wear full length trousers. Look at congress, even they can’t make unbiased clothing rules.


Why is it so hard to treat everyone equally as individuals instead of segregating them into pre-made biased boxes and restricting them from doing something that harms no-one? (Why can’t we have unisex restrooms? What can’t we teach instead of preaching? What does one do out in the world where a sexless bathroom may not be available? Males get assaulted too, what about them? Why are we peaching instead of teaching? Segregation does more harm then good.)


I don’t think we need laws to protect white heterosexual males, but then again, maybe we do as they have been an unrecognized minority for far too long and even so called privilege hasn’t overcome that.


(It’s so easy to divide by sex when we fail to teach isn’t it?)


I’m getting old, all I want to do is skate, and perhaps inspire others to express their own freedom. I shouldn’t have to choose which restroom to use based on what I’m wearing or how I feel. All I want to be is me, and I just need to tinkle.


If you have any questions or need any clarifications of my experiences, please ask.


answer with “Chairman Mr. Merrin, to Representative xxxx, the answer is____.”


Thank You

US Figure Skating Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Working Group

Back on May 24th 2022 I contacted Kadari Taylor-Watson, Director of the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion working group of US Figure Skating by email and also left a voicemail.

After a couple of weeks not hearing anything, I re-sent my email on June 23rd and also called again, and left another voicemail.

It’s been another week and still no reply.

Back in 2020, US Figure Skating was working on starting the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion working group, of which I applied to. Unfortunately I received a reply in July of 2020 that I did not qualify to be included in the group. In fact, even though I was told my contact information would be kept for future contact regarding my experiences, I never was.

Looking at US Figure Skating’s Diversity, Equity and Inclusion working group page, it seems their main focus is on Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) and not anyone else who may be marginalized for being a figure skater.

Why have a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Working Group when it’s mission statement does not line up with it’s title?

Diversity noun
di·​ver·​si·​ty | \ də-ˈvər-sə-tē , dī- \
plural diversities
Definition of diversity
1: the condition of having or being composed of differing elements : VARIETY
especially : the inclusion of people of different races (see RACE entry 1 sense 1a), cultures, etc. in a group or organization
programs intended to promote diversity in schools
2: an instance of being composed of differing elements or qualities : an instance of being diverse
a diversity of opinion

equity noun
eq·​ui·​ty | \ ˈe-kwə-tē \
plural equities
Definition of equity
1a: justice according to natural law or right
specifically : freedom from bias or favoritism
b: something that is equitable
2a: the money value of a property or of an interest in a property in excess of claims or liens against it
b: the common stock of a corporation
c: a risk interest or ownership right in property
d: a right, claim, or interest existing or valid in equity
3a: a system of law originating in the English chancery and comprising a settled and formal body of legal and procedural rules and doctrines that supplement, aid, or override common and statute law and are designed to protect rights and enforce duties fixed by substantive law
b: trial or remedial justice under or by the rules and doctrines of equity
c: a body of legal doctrines and rules developed to enlarge, supplement, or override a narrow rigid system of law

in·​clu·​sion | \ in-ˈklü-zhən \
Definition of inclusion
1: the act of including : the state of being included
2: something that is included: such as
a: a gaseous, liquid, or solid foreign body enclosed in a mass (as of a mineral)
b: a passive usually temporary product of cell activity (such as a starch grain) within the cytoplasm or nucleus
3: the act or practice of including students with disabilities with the general student population

Change the name, or change the mission statement, because right now, neither one fits!

July 8th, 2021

An update to my post on July 27th, 2020.

I have interacted with tens of thousands of kids and adults in general and in my line of work, some only briefly, others more.

Below is a something of which I need to put out, an experience of which I need to talk about and to be heard.

People who know me may know some of all that has happened in my many years of dealing with this. For others, this will be a side of me that you may not have fully known, of which I ask you to read with an open mind and to the end.

Some specific details have been moved to later in the story, other details have been left out for brevity.

Back in July of 2020 I went to the Alice Noble Ice Arena in Wooster Ohio to ice skate, as I was putting on my skates the general manager, Seth Greenburg, came to me and asked my name. I told him “Steven Arness” and he replied “I’ve heard of you from other rinks” he then told me I had to leave. When I asked why, I was told “I can’t let you skate around kids” He then seemed to imply that since they were a non-profit organization that they could restrict my participation. I told Mr. Greenburg that I’ve skated at other rinks and was told “This is Northeast Ohio” Well this can’t really apply as I’ve skated at Kent State Ice Arena, Center Ice, Brooklyn Recreation Center, Winterhurst, and one other I’m trying to remember of which are all located in “Northeast Ohio”

I’ve been dealing with this bigotry for over 16 years, considering Mr. Greenburg had heard of me before, you would think that he could of had a better response in place. Eventually I just gave up on changing his mind and left.

I had enough this time and filed a case of discrimination with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission (OCRC). Both Seth Greenburg and David Noble adamantly defended their position in not allowing me to skate. In fact they went so far as to change the age limit of who would be allowed to skate on which sessions. I was offered an unadvertised adult only session to skate on, but then told later that I still wouldn’t be allowed to participate if I showed up in the same condition.

In March of 2021 the OCRC came back and found probable cause and they offered a conciliation of which I disagreed with as I was not a party in it.

My next correspondence from the OCRC was In June of 2021 and the OCRC wrote that I chose not to participate in the conciliation (false and we are fighting this result) and that they also made an agreement with the Alice Noble Foundation which closed the case.

It’s not like I’ve stood idly by, over the past 16 years I’ve faced all kinds of marginalization and discrimination from the skating community. I contacted the American Civil Liberties Union, the United States Figure Skating Association, the Professional Skaters Association, the International Skating Union, and the Cleveland Skating Club about my experiences. The ACLU, USFSA, PSA, and the Cleveland Skating Club said there was nothing they could do, the ISU did change some of their rules which marginally benefited males while greatly benefiting most females.

Even my first coach, Jean Kendo Weigl, was not immune to the bigotry I faced as they themselves were blacklisted and harmed for their choice in teaching me. My second coach, Leslie C. Shackelford-Rinicella, says she faced the same hassles from others. Other coaches like Chris Martin just flat out refused to teach me unless I conformed to their standards while their female students were not faced with the same constraint, others just outright lied. Most however just said no or hung up and/or stopped responding to my emails after they knew who I was. Shaker from what I heard even changed their rules to deter my participation. And why is it that those who knew of what was going on and could influence and effect change did nothing?

My picture used to hang on the wall at Skaters Edge in Cleveland and Dale used tell me that people would call him to take it down before coming in. Back in the day I was skating 10 to 14 hours a week and another 8 to 15 hours in off ice exercises, even so, I was told by many that I was not taking it (skating) seriously.

For the most part however I was able to skate, but mostly on the outside of the skating community.

So why was I told to leave?

For the fact that I was wearing a rather plain leotard with an attached skirt, suntan tights and white skates. A combination that I’ve worn at numerous other rinks and rarely have had any flagrant actions taken against me.

What I wore is the same kind of attire that a female could be wearing while skating. Mr. Greenburg and David Noble said my attire was not typical male clothing and on that basis I could be told to leave.

Not a week goes by that one doesn’t hear about some kind of discrimination, be it race, gender, or sex. Even though what I endured was blatantly obvious, nobody did anything about it. When I talk about it, people at first don’t even believe me as certainly a white cisgender male couldn’t possibly be discriminated against. When I show them my picture, the typical response is that I should just wear pants. Another person argued that I couldn’t claim discrimination as a dark skinned person couldn’t easily change their skin tone to avoid it while I could just wear pants and be treated normally. Telling me to leave shows that bigotry and discrimination is far more diverse then black and white.

Being the epitome of discrimination and a white heterosexual male seems to be a myth as nobody believes you.

What it also shows is that while everyone speaks of male privilege, males are actually suppressed and a minority not only by societal precedents, but also of their own skin and mind.

What about those who witnessed my removal? What did they think? Did they think it was right for Mr. Greenburg to remove me? Was I some kind of threat? Surely I must have been as kids were secluded away from my presence. How much of a threat could I be though? Even if I did something, most anyone there could probably describe me to a T. Did they also learn then that Mr. Greenburgs actions were acceptable?

What about those who thought differently? Those who wondered who I was and what I was about yet unable to ask the question due to someone else’s bigoted actions. Were they on the fence? On my side? Were they swayed? Or did they possibly think it was wrong? If they thought it was wrong, was their voice heard? Or was it stifled like mine was?

It’s been said that people should fear the people who fear me, I couldn’t agree more.

#FearThoseWhoFearMe

June 6th, 2021

Received a letter from the Ohio Civil Rights Commission (OCRC) with the same conciliation agreement as before, however the OCRC stated that I chose not to participate in the conciliation and instead reached an agreement with The Alice Noble Foundation and closed the case.

Neither me or my attorney have any record of communication for conciliation from the OCRC since the email I received on February 3rd. As such we are unclear as to how the OCRC came to the conclusion they did.

March 15th, 2021

Received a determination letter from the Ohio Civil Rights Commission (OCRC) stating that there was a probable cause of discrimination.

February 3rd, 2021

Received an email from the Ohio Civil Rights Commission (OCRC) in which had on offer of conciliation between the OCRC and The Alice Noble Foundation and the OCRC asked if this was acceptable. Talked it over with my attorney and we decided to decline the offer since I was not included in the conciliation.

#Equality #Inclusion